Officials in the city have detained thirteen people on suspicion of manslaughter in connection with last week’s devastating fire, amid increasing criticism over the arrests of civilians demanding accountability.
Rescue teams continued to search through the seven-building complex of the Wang Fuk Court estate in the Tai Po district on the start of the week, days after the most fatal blaze in seven and a half decades. The number of fatalities reached 151 and is anticipated to climb further as the operation continues. About 40 people are still missing.
The housing complex, housing almost five thousand people, had been undergoing major refurbishment that have been linked to the origin of the blaze. In the wake of the tragedy, anger has escalated over reported previous safety breaches by the contractor working at the location and poor oversight of standards, fuelled by disclosures that occupants had been voicing concerns over the renovations for a year.
On the afternoon of Monday, authorities said the anti-graft agency had arrested thirteen people over the tragedy so far, including the directors and an technical advisor of a contracting firm, and had “immediately begun a thorough probe along the lines of involuntary manslaughter”.
A top administrator stated that seven of twenty tested specimens of the scaffolding net used around the buildings did not meet fire-retardant standards. Preliminary checks had found samples were up to code, but the spokesperson said the cheaper, substandard netting had been installed in areas hard to reach in order to evade detection, labeling it a “deplorable deed”.
“They just wanted to profit at the cost of human lives,” the official stated.
As allegations of safety violations grow, alongside reports that official bodies had issued multiple apparently ignored cautions, residents have asked why no officials have yet faced consequences. Instead, two members of the public were allegedly arrested by security forces.
One individual, identified as a Hong Kong student, was detained over an internet appeal that made “four demands” for assured assistance for the victims and responsibility for those at fault, including any corrupt or responsible government officials.
Reports said the individual was detained for “inciting disaffection”. Police did not confirm the detention, saying only that they “will take actions according to the situation and in compliance with the law”.
Local media also covered the arrest of a ex-local representative.
Asked about the arrests, the secretary of security said there had been “inaccurate comments on the internet” that were aimed to undermine national security. “As a result, we must take appropriate measures, including police action,” the secretary told a media briefing. “Operational details cannot be revealed as they concern state security.”
On Hong Kong social media, people criticised the detention of citizens. “National security must be prioritised even if the dead are still trapped in the building,” said a comment.
Some commenters drew comparisons to the Chinese mainland. “The mainland, these crimes are termed ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’,” said a user. “It’s usually met with heavy sentences. Social order trumps everything.”
A different user said: “Since we are following mainland China’s methods, by targeting the individual who raises the question, no one will dare to ask, and thus Hong Kong’s governance will have no problems.”
The detentions followed warnings by national security authorities that they would take action against anyone deemed to be exploiting the tragedy to incite “hostile” feelings.
Before the detentions, authorities had already demonstrated increased vigilance to the public reaction. Since the quelling of earlier unrest, public assemblies have been tightly controlled. In the days following the fire, community volunteers rapidly established aid operations, with hundreds of people employing cars and transit to deliver large quantities of clothes, supplies and other necessities for the survivors.
Nevertheless, by evening, armed police were monitoring the vicinity, and government officials eventually took over from the volunteer organisers.
The petition over which the student was allegedly arrested was initiated late on Friday. Its “four demands” echoed the terminology of previous campaigns but did not call for systemic reform.
The individual told reporters that he was only “putting forward fundamental demands”.
“Should these suggestions are deemed seditious or ‘transgressive’, then I feel I can’t predict the consequences of anything any more, and I can only do what I truly believe is right,” he stated.
A tech enthusiast and lifestyle writer with a passion for exploring how innovation shapes daily experiences and personal growth.